Chapter 15 – Personality – Outline

All together now – "My psychology instructor is a kind, wonderful, and benevolent person for providing me with this very outline." Yes, let’s say it all together now! Joking aside, I hope that this outline is of great utility to you. Good luck! Remember, though, that this is just an outline – it doesn’t cover in great depth everything in the chapter or in my lectures. Use it as a guide, but please, don’t use it as your only resource for study!

Let’s begin.

PERSONALITY

TRAIT THEORIES OF PERSONALITY

Traits

Types

Self-Concept

  1. How do you sum up your own personality, what personality traits do you think you have?
  2. Your idea of who you are
  3. Can run into problems when your self-concept is inaccurate – ex: you think you’re a failure despite your recent successes in the occupational & academic realms.
  4. Includes both the good & bad things that we think about ourselves

Self-esteem – how you sum up your worth. Does the good or bad predominate? Some peoiple have high self-esteem: "I can accomplish things, I’m a good person, If I asked that girl out I would have a good chance she would say yes." Some people have low self-esteem: "I’ll never get anything accomplished, I’m a lame-o loser and nobody likes me."

PERSONALITY THEORIES!!!

TRAIT THEORIES

Important folks advancing trait theories: Allport, Cattell, Costa & McCrae.

Trait approach tries to identify traits that best describe a person. Traits can be used to describe & predict behavior.

ALLPORT

  1. Gordon Allport, trait theorist
    1. Went through the unabridged English dictionary to find 18,000 traits (wow!)
      1. Common traits – traits shared by most members of a culture
        1. Ex: in the U.S., autonomy could be considered a common trait
      2. Individual traits – define a person’s unique qualities
        1. Are you curious, are you kind?
          1. Cardinal traits – traits that define someone’s personality so well that the person exemplifies that trait in everything that they do
            1. Very rare
            2. Ex: Mother Theresa: kindness & compassion
          2. Central traits – core traits that describe a person
            1. Table 15.1
          3. Secondary traits – superficial traits that aren’t always consistent
            1. Ex: political preferences, what you like to wear, etc.

CATTELL

THE BIG FIVE

Traits, Consistency, & Situations

Trait theorists content that traits are pretty much consistent across situations. However, this isn’t universally agreed upon. There is a belief in an interaction btw individual traits and situational determinants.

Do We Inherit Personality?

  1. Animal & ppl studies seem to indicate that yes, behaviors can be inherited
  2. Behavioral genetics – field dedicated to investigating this particular conundrum
  3. Some personality, just like intelligence, can be inherited in homo sapiens!
  4. How do we know this? Remember our friend to twin study from chapter 12? The same rationale applies in the study of traits as it does in the study of intelligence
    1. Minnesota Twin Study
      1. Many striking similarities found. Your text highlights an example
  5. Heredity responsible for one quarter to one half of the variation in personality (amazing!)

PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY – SIGMUND FREUD

PSYCHODYNAMIC THEORIES

Jung (yoong)

Horney

Adler

LEARNING THEORIES OF PERSONALITY

Emphasize the learned or conditioned aspects of personality. Concerned w/ situational deteriminants, not traits

Miller & Dollard

Social Learning Theory

Rotter is important. Felt 3 concepts important:

Self-reinforcement has been acknowledged – rewarding yourself for your accomplishments

Behavioristic View of Development

 

HUMANISTIC THEORIES

A personal favorite of your instructor…..

Rogers

Maslow

 

Read Personality Theories – Overview & Comparison on your own

Read Personality Assessment on Your Own

Personality Tests

Most modern personality tests are objective (remember that term from Chapter 12?)

However, some are projective. (Think Freudian ego defense mechanisms here)

The client projects their unconscious aspects of their personality onto the ambiguous stimuli that are presented to them. Since the stimuli are ambiguous, they have no inherent meaning. Meaning has to be given to them by the person.

Ex: The Rorschach Inkblot test. See page 509 – not terribly reliable or objective (remember those terms from chapter 12?) Consists of inkblots of differing shapes, sizes, and colors.

What do you see in this image?

Ex: The Thematic Apperception Test. See page 509 – uses illustrations, not inkblots. The client will tell a story about what is happening in the picture.

Read about shyness & self-monitoring.

 

YES! You are done with this outline of chapter 15. I bet you are currently thinking, "Why, yes, my instructor is so terribly kindhearted and marvelous! O! How kind she is for preparing this outline!"

Remember, of course, that this material is not intended to supplant information presented in your text of in my lecture. Good luck studying! J